How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Moto Pad 60 Neo vs N90

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo vs Nexall N90

What Moto Pad 60 Neo does better (2) and where N90 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Neo
6.5Score
2 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Nexall N90
Nexall · 2026N90
1 advantage≈ $170
5.2Memory & storage4.9

Why is Moto Pad 60 Neo better than N90?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · N90: No
  2. Weight480 g vs 615 g+28%

Why is N90 better than Moto Pad 60 Neo?

  1. Screen size11″ vs 12″+9%
Specifications

Side by side

Nexall N90Nexall N90≈ $170
Design
Weight480 g615 g
Thickness7 mm—
Height254.6 mm8 mm
Width166.2 mm—
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
Ingress protection—IP44
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursPantone: Bronze Green, Malibu Blue—
Display
Screen size11″12″
PanelIPS LCD—
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px—
Resolution (long side)2,560 px—
Pixel density274 ppi—
Refresh rate90 Hz—
Peak brightness500 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio82.9%—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300—
Chip makerMediaTek—
Process6 nm—
CPU cores8—
CPU frequency2.4 GHz—
GPUMali-G57 MC2—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—
Memory card slotYes—
Battery
Battery capacity7,040 mAh—
Wired charging20 W—
Wireless chargingNo—
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYes—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5—
Bluetooth5.2—
USBUSB Type-C 2.0—
USB version2—
NFCNo—
GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO—
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYes—
3.5 mm headphone jackYes—
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity (accessories only)—
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP—
Rear cameras1—
Ultra-wide cameraNo—
Optical stabilisationNo—
Front camera5 MP—
4K front-camera videoNo—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15—
PlatformAndroid—
EU label
Energy class—D
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—145 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—B
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare