Why is Pad 70 better than T50?
Pad 70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is T50 better than Pad 70?
- RAM4 GB vs 6 GB+50%
- Screen size10.1″ vs 11″+9%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight520 g vs 498 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 520 g | 498 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | — |
| Height | 246.5 mm | 9 mm |
| Width | 163 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 11″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | — |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | — | Unisoc |
| CPU cores | 4 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,580 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 10 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| GPS | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 126 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
