zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Redmi Pad

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad

What Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra does better (29) and where Redmi Pad wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra

9.2Score

29 advantages≈ $1,300

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2022Redmi Pad

5.1Score

1 advantage≈ $270

9.4Display4.9

8.1Performance3.5

7.9Battery5.2

9.7Memory & storage3.8

9.4Features3.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 UltraRedmi Pad

	Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra	Redmi Pad	Difference
Height	326.4 mm	250.5 mm	+75.9 mm
Width	208.6 mm	158.1 mm	+50.5 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.1 mm	−1.6 mm
Weight	732 g	465 g	+267 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra better than Redmi Pad?

AnTuTu score1,199,328 vs 319,0773.8×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,835 vs 1,8522.6×
RAM16 GB vs 6 GB2.7×
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 128 GB8×
Wired charging45 W vs 18 W2.5×
Battery capacity11,200 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+40%
Peak brightness930 nits vs 400 nits2.3×
OLED panelYes · Redmi Pad: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad: No
5GYes · Redmi Pad: No
Screen size14.6″ vs 10.6″+38%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%

Why is Redmi Pad better than Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?

Weight732 g vs 465 g+57%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra≈ $1,3009.2	Xiaomi Redmi Pad≈ $2705.1
Design
Weight	732 g	465 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	7.1 mm
Height	326.4 mm	250.5 mm
Width	208.6 mm	158.1 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	—
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	—
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green
Display
Screen size	14.6″	10.6″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,848 px	1,200 px
Resolution (long side)	2,960 px	2,000 px
Pixel density	239 ppi	220 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	930 nits	400 nits
Measured brightness	642 nits	402 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7%	80.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Mediatek Helio G99
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	1,199,328	319,077
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,835	1,852
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,829	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	6 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	64 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	11,200 mAh	8,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.1 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	32%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	—
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	—
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-21.2 LUFS	-23.9 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	MIUI 14
Major OS updates promised	4	—