How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs nubia Pad 3D

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Pad 3D

What Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra does better (21) and where nubia Pad 3D wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
9.2Score
21 advantages≈ $1,300
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Pad 3D
ZTE · 2023nubia Pad 3D
7.8Score
1 advantage≈ $1,400
9.4Display8.1
8.1Performance7.9
7.9Battery7.3
9.7Memory & storage6.1
9.4Features6.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 Ultranubia Pad 3D
208.6 × 326.45.5190 × 2858.5
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultranubia Pad 3DDifference
Height326.4 mm285 mm+41.4 mm
Width208.6 mm190 mm+18.6 mm
Thickness5.5 mm8.5 mm−3 mm
Weight732 g780 g−48 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra better than nubia Pad 3D?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  3. Battery capacity11,200 mAh vs 9,070 mAh+23%
  4. OLED panelYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
  5. Cellular (LTE)Yes · nubia Pad 3D: No
  6. 5GYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
  7. Screen size14.6″ vs 12.4″+18%
  8. Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
  9. Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  10. eSIMYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
  11. Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Pad 3D: No
  12. CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+18%

Why is nubia Pad 3D better than Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?

  1. Rear camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications

Side by side

ZTE nubia Pad 3DZTE nubia Pad 3D≈ $1,4007.8
Design
Weight732 g780 g
Thickness5.5 mm8.5 mm
Height326.4 mm285 mm
Width208.6 mm190 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla GlassCorning Gorilla Glass
ColoursBeige, GraphiteGray
Display
Screen size14.6″12.4″
PanelDynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (short side)1,848 px1,600 px
Resolution (long side)2,960 px2,560 px
Pixel density239 ppi243 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness930 nits—
Measured brightness642 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.7%82.3%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm5 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.36 GHz2.84 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 660
AnTuTu score1,199,328—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,835—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,829—
Memory
RAM16 GB8 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity11,200 mAh9,070 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Active use (test)11.1 h—
Wired charging45 W33 W
Charged in 30 min32%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1
USB version3.23.1
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)YesYes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSBDS
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-21.2 LUFS—
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder display—
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP16 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/1.9
Rear cameras22
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K—
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Front camera12 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoYesNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 12L
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 6—
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare