zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab S9 vs iQOO Pad

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Vivo iQOO Pad

What Galaxy Tab S9 does better (12) and where iQOO Pad wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9

8.6Score

12 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Vivo · 2023iQOO Pad

8.6Score

9 advantages≈ $370

8.3Display8.4

8.5Performance8.7

7.2Battery7.8

7.0Memory & storage7.2

9.4Features6.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9iQOO Pad

	Galaxy Tab S9	iQOO Pad	Difference
Height	254.3 mm	266 mm	−11.7 mm
Width	165.8 mm	191.6 mm	−25.8 mm
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.6 mm	−0.7 mm
Weight	498 g	585 g	−87 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than iQOO Pad?

OLED panelYes · iQOO Pad: No
Cellular (LTE)Yes · iQOO Pad: No
5GYes · iQOO Pad: No
Memory card slotYes · iQOO Pad: No
eSIMYes · iQOO Pad: No
GPSYes · iQOO Pad: No
Weight498 g vs 585 g+17%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+5%
Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
Front camera12 MP vs 8 MP+50%
Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.6 mm+12%

Why is iQOO Pad better than Galaxy Tab S9?

Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 10,000 mAh+19%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
Screen size11″ vs 12.1″+10%
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Galaxy Tab S9: Yes
Pixel density274 ppi vs 283 ppi+3%
Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 1,968 px+23%
Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 2,800 px+9%
Screen-to-body ratio83.2% vs 87.2%+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab S9≈ $5408.6	Vivo iQOO Pad≈ $3708.6
Design
Weight	498 g	585 g
Thickness	5.9 mm	6.6 mm
Height	254.3 mm	266 mm
Width	165.8 mm	191.6 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Aluminium	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass	—
Colours	Beige, Graphite	Gray
Display
Screen size	11″	12.1″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	1,968 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	274 ppi	283 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	576 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	87.2%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Mediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.36 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 740	Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score	1,771,415	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	5,838	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	3,917	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	8,400 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	45 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	38%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	3.2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/2	f/2.2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Front camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	Yes	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 6	OriginOS 3
Major OS updates promised	4	—