vs
8.3Display7.1
8.5Performance4.7
7.2Battery7.0
7.0Memory & storage4.8
9.4Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab S9Pad 5
| Galaxy Tab S9 | Pad 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 254.3 mm | 254.7 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 166.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 498 g | 511 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than Pad 5?
- AnTuTu score1,771,415 vs 473,8193.7×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,838 vs 2,5832.3×
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- OLED panelYes · Pad 5: No
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 5: No
- Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
- Measured brightness576 nits vs 478 nits+21%
- Memory card slotYes · Pad 5: No
- eSIMYes · Pad 5: No
- GPSYes · Pad 5: No
- CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 2.96 GHz+14%
Why is Pad 5 better than Galaxy Tab S9?
- Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 8,720 mAh+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 498 g | 511 g |
| Thickness | 5.9 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 254.3 mm | 254.7 mm |
| Width | 165.8 mm | 166.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | — |
| Colours | Beige, Graphite | Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,600 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,560 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 274 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 576 nits | 478 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.2% | 82.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.36 GHz | 2.96 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,771,415 | 473,819 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,838 | 2,583 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,917 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,400 mAh | 8,720 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | — |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.4 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | Yes | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | MIUI 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8.66.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 FEvsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
7.28.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
8.98.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 UltravsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
9.28.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9vsXiaomi Pad 7
8.68.2


