How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Tab S9 vs Pad 7 Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro

What Galaxy Tab S9 does better (9) and where Pad 7 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab S9
8.6Score
9 advantages≈ $540
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi · 2024Pad 7 Pro
8.4Score
15 advantages≈ $540
8.3Display8.7
8.5Performance8.4
7.2Battery6.8
7.0Memory & storage7.2
9.4Features8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab S9Pad 7 Pro
165.8 × 254.35.9173.4 × 251.26.2
Galaxy Tab S9Pad 7 ProDifference
Height254.3 mm251.2 mm+3.1 mm
Width165.8 mm173.4 mm−7.6 mm
Thickness5.9 mm6.2 mm−0.3 mm
Weight498 g500 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab S9 better than Pad 7 Pro?

  1. OLED panelYes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  2. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  3. 5GYes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,838 vs 4,947+18%
  5. Memory card slotYes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  6. eSIMYes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  7. GPSYes · Pad 7 Pro: No
  8. CPU frequency3.36 GHz vs 3 GHz+12%
  9. Thickness5.9 mm vs 6.2 mm+5%

Why is Pad 7 Pro better than Galaxy Tab S9?

  1. Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
  2. AnTuTu score1,771,415 vs 1,880,949+6%
  3. Battery capacity8,400 mAh vs 8,850 mAh+5%
  4. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  5. Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
  6. Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
  7. Front camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
  8. Peak brightness600 nits vs 800 nits+33%
  9. Measured brightness576 nits vs 760 nits+32%
  10. Pixel density274 ppi vs 345 ppi+26%
  11. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
  12. Charged in 30 min38% vs 60%+58%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Pad 7 ProXiaomi Pad 7 Pro≈ $5408.4
Design
Weight498 g500 g
Thickness5.9 mm6.2 mm
Height254.3 mm251.2 mm
Width165.8 mm173.4 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackAluminiumAluminium
Ingress protectionIP68—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass—
ColoursBeige, GraphiteGray, Blue, Green
Display
Screen size11″11.2″
PanelDynamic AMOLED 2XIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (short side)1,600 px2,136 px
Resolution (long side)2,560 px3,200 px
Pixel density274 ppi345 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits800 nits
Measured brightness576 nits760 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.2%85.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.36 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 740Adreno 735
AnTuTu score1,771,4151,880,949
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,8384,947
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,917—
Memory
RAM12 GB12 GB
Storage (max)256 GB512 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity8,400 mAh8,850 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—10.2 h
Wired charging45 W67 W
Charged in 30 min38%60%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GYesNo
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.2
USB version3.23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)YesYes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS—
Features
Stylus supportYesYes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.3 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide / power button
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera13 MP50 MP
Rear camera aperturef/2f/1.8
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video4K4K
4K video frame rate30 fps60 fps
Front camera12 MP32 MP
4K front-camera videoYesNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 6HyperOS 2
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare