How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Tablets
  3. Honor MagicPad 3
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Honor MagicPad 3

10 tablets at a similar price that compete with the MagicPad 3 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Honor MagicPad 3
Honor · 2025
MagicPad 3
13.3″Snapdragon 8 Gen 316 GB12,450 mAh
approx. price≈ $390
9.4

Alternatives to the MagicPad 3

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
1
Xiaomi · 2025Pad 7S Pro 12.5
9.6
10% pricier ≈ $430
  • AnTuTu score 2,963,052 vs 2,333,285
  • Wired charging 120 W vs 66 W
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,431 vs 6,707
  • Battery capacity 10,610 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
  • Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 165 Hz
Vivo Pad5 Pro
2
Vivo · 2025Pad5 Pro
9.2
Same price ≈ $390
  • AnTuTu score 2,825,476 vs 2,333,285
  • Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 8,542 vs 6,707
  • GPS
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 7
Vivo IQOO Pad5 Pro
3
Vivo · 2025IQOO Pad5 Pro
9.5
8% pricier ≈ $420
  • GPS
  • Peak brightness 1,200 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • CPU frequency 3.73 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Battery capacity 12,050 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
OPPO Pad 4 Pro
4
OPPO · 2025Pad 4 Pro
9.5
10% pricier ≈ $430
  • CPU frequency 4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Pixel density 315 ppi vs 289 ppi
  • Process 3 nm vs 4 nm
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Battery capacity 12,140 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
6
OnePlus · 2025Pad 2 Pro
9.5
10% pricier ≈ $430
  • CPU frequency 4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Pixel density 315 ppi vs 289 ppi
  • Process 3 nm vs 4 nm
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Battery capacity 12,140 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
7
Xiaomi · 2025Pad 8 Pro
9.2
5% cheaper ≈ $370
  • Rear camera 50 MP vs 13 MP
  • Front camera 32 MP vs 9 MP
  • CPU frequency 4.32 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Battery capacity 9,200 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
OPPO Pad 5 (China)
8
OPPO · 2025Pad 5 (China)
9.3
15% cheaper ≈ $330
  • CPU frequency 3.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • Pixel density 304 ppi vs 289 ppi
  • Weight 577 g vs 595 g
  • Storage (max) 512 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • Battery capacity 10,420 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
ZTE nubia Pad Pro
9
ZTE · 2025nubia Pad Pro
9.0
15% pricier ≈ $450
  • Front camera 20 MP vs 9 MP
  • Weight 523 g vs 595 g
  • Pixel density 312 ppi vs 289 ppi
  • Battery capacity 10,100 mAh vs 12,450 mAh
  • Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 7
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare