How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Tablets
  3. Vivo Pad SE
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Vivo Pad SE

10 tablets at a similar price that compete with the Pad SE — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Vivo Pad SE
Vivo · 2025
Pad SE
12.3″Snapdragon 4 Gen 28 GB8,500 mAh
approx. price≈ $130
6.5

Alternatives to the Pad SE

OPPO Pad SE
1
OPPO · 2025Pad SE
6.7
8% cheaper ≈ $120
  • Wired charging 33 W vs 15 W
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Battery capacity 9,340 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Screen size 11″ vs 12.3″
  • Peak brightness 500 nits vs 600 nits
Kingrid W90
2
Kingrid · 2025W90
6.9
8% cheaper ≈ $120
  • Storage (base) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Weight 534 g vs 559 g
  • Peak brightness 380 nits vs 600 nits
  • Screen size 11″ vs 12.3″
Tecno Megapad SE
3
Tecno · 2026Megapad SE
6.5
Same price ≈ $130
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • CPU frequency 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • Memory card slot
  • Battery capacity 8,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Screen size 11″ vs 12.3″
Blackview Zeno 10
4
Blackview · 2025Zeno 10
6.6
31% pricier ≈ $170
  • Battery capacity 8,800 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Memory card slot
  • Wired charging 18 W vs 15 W
  • RAM 6 GB vs 8 GB
  • Peak brightness 400 nits vs 600 nits
Kingrid T20
5
Kingrid · 2025T20
16% cheaper ≈ $110
  • Weight 412 g vs 559 g
  • Storage (base) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 4.2
  • Screen size 10.1″ vs 12.3″
Doogee U12
6
Doogee · 2025U12
6.3
23% pricier ≈ $160
  • Battery capacity 9,000 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Memory card slot
  • Bluetooth 5.3 vs 4.2
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 256 GB
  • RAM 6 GB vs 8 GB
Honor Pad X8b
7
Honor · 2026Pad X8b
7.4
23% pricier ≈ $160
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Battery capacity 10,100 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Memory card slot
  • Screen size 11″ vs 12.3″
  • Storage (base) 64 GB vs 128 GB
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
9
Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Neo
6.5
39% pricier ≈ $180
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Wired charging 20 W vs 15 W
  • Memory card slot
  • Battery capacity 7,040 mAh vs 8,500 mAh
  • Storage (max) 128 GB vs 256 GB
OSCAL Pad 200
10
OSCAL · 2026Pad 200
6.9
31% pricier ≈ $170
  • Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • Screen size 13.4″ vs 12.3″
  • Memory card slot
  • RAM 6 GB vs 8 GB
  • Peak brightness 350 nits vs 600 nits
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare