How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
634 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Tablets
  3. Zebra ET65
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Zebra ET65

10 tablets at a similar price that compete with the ET65 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Zebra ET65
Zebra · 2023
ET65
10.1″Qualcomm Snapdragon8 GB
approx. price≈ $2,600
6.4

Alternatives to the ET65

Umidigi Active T1
1
Umidigi · 2023Active T1
6.7
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Screen size 11″ vs 10.1″
  • Weight 756 g vs 1,074 g
  • Peak brightness 420 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • eSIM
Cubot Tab KingKong
2
Cubot · 2023Tab KingKong
6.8
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Weight 820 g vs 1,074 g
  • eSIM
  • Bluetooth 4.2 vs 5.2
ZTE nubia Pad 3D
4
ZTE · 2023nubia Pad 3D
7.8
46% cheaper ≈ $1,400
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Screen size 12.4″ vs 10.1″
  • Weight 780 g vs 1,074 g
  • eSIM
Doogee T10Pro
5
Doogee · 2023T10Pro
6.3
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Weight 568 g vs 1,074 g
  • eSIM
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 5.2
AlldoCube iPlay 70 mini Pro
6
AlldoCube · 2025iPlay 70 mini Pro
5.9
9% pricier ≈ $2,800
  • Weight 310 g vs 1,074 g
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Storage (base) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Peak brightness 400 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Screen size 8.4″ vs 10.1″
Doogee T10Plus
7
Doogee · 2023T10Plus
6.3
  • Weight 505 g vs 1,074 g
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • eSIM
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 5.2
OSCAL Pad 15
8
OSCAL · 2023Pad 15
6.3
  • Weight 449 g vs 1,074 g
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • eSIM
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 5.2
OSCAL Pad 18
9
OSCAL · 2023Pad 18
7.1
  • Weight 490 g vs 1,074 g
  • RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • eSIM
  • Bluetooth 5 vs 5.2
OSCAL Elite 1
10
OSCAL · 2024Elite 1
7.6
  • Storage (max) 256 GB vs 128 GB
  • Cellular (LTE)
  • Weight 587 g vs 1,074 g
  • Peak brightness 600 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • eSIM
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare