vs
6.8Display3.3
5.9Performance4.3
5.8Battery3.3
4.6Memory & storage4.6
3.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Tab A1 NxtPaperBlack Shark Pad SE
| Tab A1 NxtPaper | Black Shark Pad SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 251.3 mm | 255 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Width | 163.2 mm | 167 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 7.4 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 426 g | 478 g | −52 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Tab A1 NxtPaper better than Black Shark Pad SE?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Battery capacity8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+21%
- Wired charging20 W vs 10 W2×
- Pixel density226 ppi vs 149 ppi+52%
- Screen size11″ vs 10.1″+9%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Weight426 g vs 478 g+12%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 450 nits+11%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Resolution (short side)1,320 px vs 800 px+65%
- Resolution (long side)2,112 px vs 1,280 px+65%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.5% vs 69.5%+23%
Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than Tab A1 NxtPaper?
- Cellular (LTE)No · Tab A1 NxtPaper: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 426 g | 478 g |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 251.3 mm | 255 mm |
| Width | 163.2 mm | 167 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Aluminium | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Aerolite Grey | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,320 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,112 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 226 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.5% | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | 20 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/2 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7BvsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
vs
Jumper Z3vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
vs
Xoro MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
5.86.1
vs
Motorola Moto Pad (2026)vsTCL Tab A1 NxtPaper
6.16.1
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
Nexall N90vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE