vs
4.9Memory & storage4.6
Why is N90 better than Black Shark Pad SE?
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Screen size12″ vs 10.1″+19%
Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than N90?
- Cellular (LTE)No · N90: Yes
- Weight615 g vs 478 g+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 615 g | 478 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 8 mm | 255 mm |
| Width | — | 167 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 12″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | — | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | — | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 6,600 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 16 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 145 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
