zh.md
Compare
Armor Pad 5 Ultra vs Pad 7 Ultra

UleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra vs Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

What Armor Pad 5 Ultra does better (8) and where Pad 7 Ultra wins (17) — every spec side by side.

UleFone · 2025Armor Pad 5 Ultra

9.4Score

8 advantages≈ $700

Xiaomi · 2025Pad 7 Ultra

9.7Score

17 advantages≈ $760

Higher score

6.6Display9.7

8.4Performance9.7

9.8Battery9.7

9.6Memory & storage9.4

9.8Features8.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Armor Pad 5 UltraPad 7 Ultra

	Armor Pad 5 Ultra	Pad 7 Ultra	Difference
Height	269.7 mm	305.8 mm	−36.1 mm
Width	179.5 mm	207.5 mm	−28 mm
Thickness	27.8 mm	5.1 mm	+22.7 mm
Weight	1,600 g	609 g	+991 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Armor Pad 5 Ultra better than Pad 7 Ultra?

Battery capacity24,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh2×
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
5GYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
Storage (base)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
GPSYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 7 Ultra: No
Rear camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%

Why is Pad 7 Ultra better than Armor Pad 5 Ultra?

Weight1,600 g vs 609 g2.6×
Peak brightness600 nits vs 1,600 nits2.7×
OLED panelNo · Armor Pad 5 Ultra: Yes
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Screen size11″ vs 14″+27%
Thickness27.8 mm vs 5.1 mm5.5×
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz+42%
Pixel density206 ppi vs 275 ppi+33%
Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 2,136 px+78%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	UleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra≈ $7009.4	Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra≈ $7609.7
Design
Weight	1,600 g	609 g
Thickness	27.8 mm	5.1 mm
Height	269.7 mm	305.8 mm
Width	179.5 mm	207.5 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Black	Gray, Blue
Display
Screen size	11″	14″
Panel	IPS LCD	AMOLED
OLED panel	No	Yes
Resolution (short side)	1,200 px	2,136 px
Resolution (long side)	1,920 px	3,200 px
Pixel density	206 ppi	275 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	600 nits	1,600 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	72.5%	92%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 7400X	Xring O1
Chip maker	MediaTek	Xring
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	10
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.7 GHz
GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Immortalis-G925 MP16
AnTuTu score	—	2,963,052
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	9,191
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	512 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	24,200 mAh	12,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)	—	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	—
Features
Stylus support	—	Yes
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	Side / power button
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	64 MP	50 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Front camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 2
EU label
Energy class	D	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	402 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	D	—

Related comparisons

Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsUleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra

UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsOnePlus Pad 3 9.49.4

UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsZebra ET401 8

UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsUleFone Armor Pad 4 Ultra 9.48.0

Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsXiaomi Pad 7 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 UltravsXiaomi Pad 7 Ultra 9.59.7