vs
9.6Memory & storage3.3
Why is Armor Pad 5 Ultra better than ET401 8?
- RAM12 GB vs 6 GB2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 64 GB8×
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · ET401 8: No
- Screen size11″ vs 8″+38%
- Storage (base)512 GB vs 64 GB8×
Why is ET401 8 better than Armor Pad 5 Ultra?
- Weight1,600 g vs 480 g3.3×
- eSIMNo · Armor Pad 5 Ultra: Yes
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 1,600 g | 480 g |
| Thickness | 27.8 mm | — |
| Height | 269.7 mm | 11 mm |
| Width | 179.5 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | — |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 72.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X | Qualcomm Dragonwing |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 512 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 24,200 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 120 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | — |
| GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer | — |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 64 MP | — |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | — |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | — |
| Optical stabilisation | No | — |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | — |
| 4K front-camera video | No | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 402 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G3vsUleFone Armor Pad 5 Ultra
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsOnePlus Pad 3
9.49.4
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsXiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
9.49.7
vs
UleFone Armor Pad 5 UltravsUleFone Armor Pad 4 Ultra
9.48.0
vs
Huawei MatePad 12X 2025vsZebra ET401 8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FEvsZebra ET401 8