vs
9.2Display9.4
9.8Performance9.8
7.9Battery9.7
9.4Memory & storage9.4
7.5Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
iQOO Pad UltraPad 9 Pro Max
| iQOO Pad Ultra | Pad 9 Pro Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 197.4 mm | 296.2 mm | −98.8 mm |
| Width | 126.3 mm | 203.1 mm | −76.8 mm |
| Thickness | 5.7 mm | 5.7 mm | = |
| Weight | 298 g | 645 g | −347 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iQOO Pad Ultra better than Pad 9 Pro Max?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,000 nits4.5×
- Weight298 g vs 645 g2.2×
- OLED panelYes · Pad 9 Pro Max: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- CPU frequency5.01 GHz vs 4.35 GHz+15%
- Process2 nm vs 3 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.1% vs 87.6%+3%
Why is Pad 9 Pro Max better than iQOO Pad Ultra?
- Battery capacity9,020 mAh vs 12,000 mAh+33%
- Screen size8.8″ vs 13.3″+51%
- AnTuTu score4,518,403 vs 5,137,645+14%
- Wired charging66 W vs 120 W+82%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)11,703 vs 13,220+13%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Resolution (short side)1,440 px vs 2,272 px+58%
- Resolution (long side)2,304 px vs 3,408 px+48%
- CPU cores8 vs 10+25%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 298 g | 645 g |
| Thickness | 5.7 mm | 5.7 mm |
| Height | 197.4 mm | 296.2 mm |
| Width | 126.3 mm | 203.1 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Silver | Gray, Silver, Burgundy red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.8″ | 13.3″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,440 px | 2,272 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,304 px | 3,408 px |
| Pixel density | 309 ppi | 308 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 87.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | XRing O3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Xring |
| Process | 2 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| CPU frequency | 5.01 GHz | 4.35 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 850 | Arm G2-Ultra NX MC16 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,518,403 | 5,137,645 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,703 | 13,220 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 9,020 mAh | 12,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 66 W | 120 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 17 | Android 17 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 7 HD | HyperOS 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Lenovo Legion Tab G5vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsRedmagic Astra 2 Gaming
vs
Honor MagicPad4vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
9.69.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab S12+vsVivo iQOO Pad Ultra
9.59.4
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsHuawei MatePad Pro 12 (2026)
9.49.5
vs
Vivo iQOO Pad UltravsLenovo Yoga Tab Plus Gen 2
9.49.7