How we score Blog Advertise
zh.md
Find a model
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side
CompareRankings
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Iconia iM11-22M5G vs Black Shark Pad SE

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

What Iconia iM11-22M5G does better (17) and where Black Shark Pad SE wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G
Acer · 2026Iconia iM11-22M5G
6.8Score
17 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi · 2026Black Shark Pad SE
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ $220
6.8Display3.3
7.4Performance4.3
4.3Battery3.3
5.2Memory & storage4.6
9.3Features4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Iconia iM11-22M5GBlack Shark Pad SE
177.7 × 261.77.9167 × 2557.4
Iconia iM11-22M5GBlack Shark Pad SEDifference
Height261.7 mm255 mm+6.7 mm
Width177.7 mm167 mm+10.7 mm
Thickness7.9 mm7.4 mm+0.5 mm
Weight535 g478 g+57 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Iconia iM11-22M5G better than Black Shark Pad SE?

  1. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
  2. 5GYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
  3. Battery capacity7,400 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+12%
  4. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  5. Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
  6. Pixel density230 ppi vs 149 ppi+54%
  7. Screen size11.4″ vs 10.1″+13%
  8. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+30%
  9. Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
  10. GPSYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
  11. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
  12. Rear camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×

Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than Iconia iM11-22M5G?

  1. Weight535 g vs 478 g+12%
  2. Thickness7.9 mm vs 7.4 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GAcer Iconia iM11-22M5G≈ $2506.8
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE≈ $2204.9
Design
Weight535 g478 g
Thickness7.9 mm7.4 mm
Height261.7 mm255 mm
Width177.7 mm167 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackAluminium—
ColoursSilverBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size11.4″10.1″
PanelIPS LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,440 px800 px
Resolution (long side)2,200 px1,280 px
Pixel density230 ppi149 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits450 nits
Screen-to-body ratio83.3%69.5%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7050Mediatek Helio G85
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz2 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G52 MC2
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1—
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity7,400 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired charging18 W10 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesYes
5GYesNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
NFCNoNo
GPSYesNo
Features
Stylus supportYes—
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
Fingerprint sensorYes—
SensorsFingerprint (top-mounted)Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera16 MP8 MP
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Front camera8 MP5 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid

Related comparisons

Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs HANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsHANNspree HANNSpad SN14TP7B Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs Infinix Xpad 30 Pro Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsInfinix Xpad 30 Pro 6.86.8 Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs TCL Tab A1 Plus Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsTCL Tab A1 Plus 6.86.5 Acer Iconia iM11-22M5G vs UleFone Tab A12 Pro Acer Iconia iM11-22M5GvsUleFone Tab A12 Pro 6.86.7 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 4.95.4 Nexall N90 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Nexall N90vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare