vs
5.9Display5.7
3.7Battery6.8
5.2Memory & storage5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
iPlay 80 mini ProZeno 10
| iPlay 80 mini Pro | Zeno 10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 7 mm | 8 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 168 mm | −42 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 517 g | −317 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Zeno 10?
- Weight200 g vs 517 g2.6×
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 206 ppi+31%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 400 nits+12%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm+12%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%
Why is Zeno 10 better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 8,800 mAh+45%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
- Screen size8.4″ vs 11″+31%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 517 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 168 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gray | Shadow Black, Ice Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 11″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,920 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 400 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | 81.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | — |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | DokeOS 4.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 157 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
6.05.4