How we score Blog Advertise
zh.md
Find a model
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side
CompareRankings
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. iPlay 80 mini Pro vs Black Shark Pad SE

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE

What iPlay 80 mini Pro does better (9) and where Black Shark Pad SE wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
AlldoCube · 2026iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.4Score
9 advantages≈ $170
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
Xiaomi · 2026Black Shark Pad SE
4.9Score
3 advantages≈ $220
5.9Display3.3
3.7Battery3.3
5.2Memory & storage4.6

Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Black Shark Pad SE?

  1. Weight200 g vs 478 g2.4×
  2. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
  3. Pixel density270 ppi vs 149 ppi+81%
  4. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  5. Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
  6. Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
  7. Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
  8. Screen-to-body ratio80.1% vs 69.5%+15%
  9. Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?

  1. Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
  2. Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+9%
  3. Screen size8.4″ vs 10.1″+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro≈ $1705.4
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE≈ $2204.9
Design
Weight200 g478 g
Thickness7.3 mm7.4 mm
Height7 mm255 mm
Width126 mm167 mm
ColoursGrayBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size8.4″10.1″
PanelLTPS TFTIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px800 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px1,280 px
Pixel density270 ppi149 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits450 nits
Screen-to-body ratio80.1%69.5%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocMediatek Helio G85
Chip makerUnisocMediaTek
Process—12 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2 GHz
GPU—Mali-G52 MC2
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,050 mAh6,600 mAh
Wired charging18 W10 W
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoYes
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoYes
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45
USB—USB Type-C
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—No
Sensors—Accelerometer
Cameras
Rear camera—8 MP
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—5 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid

Related comparisons

Nexall N90 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.55.4 Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.55.4 UleFone RugKing Pad Pro vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.65.4 Blackview Zeno 5 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 6.05.4 Nexall N90 vs Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE Nexall N90vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare