AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo

What iPlay 80 mini Pro does better (2) and where Moto Pad 60 Neo wins (10) — every spec side by side.

5.4Score

2 advantages≈ $170

Motorola · 2025Moto Pad 60 Neo

6.5Score

10 advantages≈ $180

Higher score

5.9Display7.0

3.7Battery4.3

5.2Memory & storage5.2

Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Moto Pad 60 Neo?

Specifications

Only differences	AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro≈ $1705.4	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo≈ $1806.5
Design
Weight	200 g	480 g
Thickness	7.3 mm	7 mm
Height	7 mm	254.6 mm
Width	126 mm	166.2 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Gray	Pantone: Bronze Green, Malibu Blue
Display
Screen size	8.4″	11″
Panel	LTPS TFT	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,200 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	1,920 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	270 ppi	274 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	450 nits	500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	80.1%	82.9%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc	Mediatek Dimensity 6300
Chip maker	Unisoc	MediaTek
Process	—	6 nm
CPU cores	—	8
CPU frequency	—	2.4 GHz
GPU	—	Mali-G57 MC2
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	6,050 mAh	7,040 mAh
Wired charging	18 W	20 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	No	Yes
5G	No	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	—	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5.2
USB	—	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	—	2
NFC	—	No
GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stylus support	—	Yes
Stereo speakers	—	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	—	Yes
Sensors	—	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	—	8 MP
Rear cameras	—	1
Ultra-wide camera	—	No
Optical stabilisation	—	No
Front camera	—	5 MP
4K front-camera video	—	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android