How we score Blog Advertise
zh.md
Find a model
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side
CompareRankings
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. iPlay 80 mini Pro vs Pad 200

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro vs OSCAL Pad 200

What iPlay 80 mini Pro does better (6) and where Pad 200 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
AlldoCube · 2026iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.4Score
6 advantages≈ $170
vs
OSCAL Pad 200
OSCAL · 2026Pad 200
6.9Score
5 advantages≈ $170
Higher score
5.9Display6.3
3.7Battery7.0
5.2Memory & storage5.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

iPlay 80 mini ProPad 200
126 × 77.3201.5 × 87.9
iPlay 80 mini ProPad 200Difference
Height7 mm8 mm−1 mm
Width126 mm201.5 mm−75.5 mm
Thickness7.3 mm7.9 mm−0.6 mm
Weight200 g750 g−550 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Pad 200?

  1. Weight200 g vs 750 g3.8×
  2. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  3. Pixel density270 ppi vs 169 ppi+60%
  4. Peak brightness450 nits vs 350 nits+29%
  5. Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+8%
  6. Bluetooth5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is Pad 200 better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?

  1. Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 8,300 mAh+37%
  2. Screen size8.4″ vs 13.4″+60%
  3. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  4. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
  5. Screen-to-body ratio80.1% vs 83.5%+4%
Specifications

Side by side

AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini ProAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro≈ $1705.4
OSCAL Pad 200OSCAL Pad 200≈ $1706.9
Design
Weight200 g750 g
Thickness7.3 mm7.9 mm
Height7 mm8 mm
Width126 mm201.5 mm
Ingress protection—IP50
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx0
ColoursGraySpace Grey, Glacier Blue
Display
Screen size8.4″13.4″
PanelLTPS TFTIPS TFT
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)1,200 px1,200 px
Resolution (long side)1,920 px1,920 px
Pixel density270 ppi169 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness450 nits350 nits
Screen-to-body ratio80.1%83.5%
Performance
ChipsetUnisocUnisoc Tiger
Chip makerUnisocUnisoc
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Memory card slotYesYes
Battery
Battery capacity6,050 mAh8,300 mAh
Wired charging18 W—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5GNoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMNoYes
Bluetooth5.45
Software
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16
PlatformAndroidAndroid
Interface—DokeOS 5.0
EU label
Energy class—D
Battery charge cycles—800
Endurance per cycle—138 h
Repairability class—B
Drop resistance class—C

Related comparisons

Nexall N90 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.55.4 Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.55.4 Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SE vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 4.95.4 UleFone RugKing Pad Pro vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.65.4 Blackview Zeno 5 vs AlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 6.05.4
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare