vs
5.9Display3.8
3.7Battery3.3
5.2Memory & storage4.8
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Galaxy Tab A11?
- Battery capacity6,050 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+19%
- Weight200 g vs 335 g+68%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 179 ppi+51%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Wired charging18 W vs 15 W+20%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,340 px+43%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 8 mm+10%
Why is Galaxy Tab A11 better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
- Screen size8.4″ vs 8.7″+4%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 500 nits+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 335 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 211 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 124.7 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx2 |
| Colours | Gray | Gray, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 436 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | 81.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 545,546 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,049 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 26% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 94 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
6.05.4


