vs
5.9Display3.0
3.7Battery3.4
5.2Memory & storage3.1
Why is iPlay 80 mini Pro better than Blade X1001?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 149 ppi+81%
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,920 px vs 1,280 px+50%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 8 mm+10%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Blade X1001 better than iPlay 80 mini Pro?
- Cellular (LTE)No · iPlay 80 mini Pro: Yes
- Screen size8.4″ vs 10.1″+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio80.1% vs 83.6%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 7 mm | 238.4 mm |
| Width | 126 mm | 148.4 mm |
| Colours | Gray | Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.4″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | LTPS TFT | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.1% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,050 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 5 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Front camera | — | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 96 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | E |
Related comparisons
vs
Nexall N90vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.55.4
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Blackview Zeno 5vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
6.05.4


