vs
7.7Display8.8
6.8Performance8.8
6.9Battery8.2
7.2Memory & storage7.2
5.6Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 11.5 SPad 3 (China)
| MatePad 11.5 S | Pad 3 (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261 mm | 257.8 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | 189.1 mm | −11.9 mm |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 6.3 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 510 g | 533 g | −23 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 11.5 S better than Pad 3 (China)?
- Weight510 g vs 533 g+5%
- Rear camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Pad 3 (China) better than MatePad 11.5 S?
- Wired charging22 W vs 67 W3×
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 9,520 mAh+8%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 700 nits+40%
- CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+35%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 2,000 px+9%
- USB version3 vs 3.2+7%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 510 g | 533 g |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 6.3 mm |
| Height | 261 mm | 257.8 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | 189.1 mm |
| Colours | Space Gray, Silver Frost, Violet | Green, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 11.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 2,000 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 296 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | 447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 751,382 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,882 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 9,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3 | 3.2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | — |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.2 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
| Interface | — | ColorOS 15 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.17.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsTeclast T65 Max
7.67.2
vs
Xiaomi Poco PadvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.37.6
vs
Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5GvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.97.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201