vs
7.7Display5.5
6.8Performance5.4
6.9Battery9.6
7.2Memory & storage7.6
5.6Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
MatePad 11.5 SArmor Pad 3 Pro
| MatePad 11.5 S | Armor Pad 3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 261 mm | 261.7 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | 166.8 mm | +10.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 21.2 mm | −15 mm |
| Weight | 510 g | 1,243 g | −733 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is MatePad 11.5 S better than Armor Pad 3 Pro?
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 60 Hz2.4×
- Weight510 g vs 1,243 g2.4×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size11.5″ vs 10.4″+11%
- Thickness6.2 mm vs 21.2 mm3.4×
- Pixel density291 ppi vs 225 ppi+29%
- CPU frequency2.49 GHz vs 2 GHz+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,200 px+53%
- USB version3 vs 2+50%
- Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,000 px+40%
Why is Armor Pad 3 Pro better than MatePad 11.5 S?
- Battery capacity8,800 mAh vs 33,280 mAh3.8×
- Wired charging22 W vs 66 W2.9×
- Cellular (LTE)No · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
- Rear camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Front camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
- GPSNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · MatePad 11.5 S: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 510 g | 1,243 g |
| Thickness | 6.2 mm | 21.2 mm |
| Height | 261 mm | 261.7 mm |
| Width | 177.2 mm | 166.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Space Gray, Silver Frost, Violet | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11.5″ | 10.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,840 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 2,800 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 291 ppi | 225 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 447 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7% | 70% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000WL | Mediatek MT8788 |
| Chip maker | Kirin | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.49 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| AnTuTu score | 751,382 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,882 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 33,280 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 22 W | 66 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | Yes |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3 | 2 |
| Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort) | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | Yes | — |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Harmony OS 4.2 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Other (Windows, …) | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | D |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 167 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad ProvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.17.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsTeclast T65 Max
7.67.2
vs
Xiaomi Poco PadvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.37.6
vs
Apple iPad Air 11 (2024)vsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.57.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 5GvsHuawei MatePad 11.5 S
7.97.6
vs
Huawei MatePad 11.5 SvsWortmann Terra Pad 1201


