zh.md
Compare
MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) vs nubia RedMagic Tablet

Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) vs ZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet

What MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) does better (13) and where nubia RedMagic Tablet wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Huawei · 2024MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)

9.3Score

13 advantages≈ $620

ZTE · 2023nubia RedMagic Tablet

9.3Score

3 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

9.8Display8.2

7.1Performance8.9

9.2Battery8.7

9.4Memory & storage9.1

8.0Features9.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)nubia RedMagic Tablet

	MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)	nubia RedMagic Tablet	Difference
Height	271.3 mm	279.7 mm	−8.4 mm
Width	182.5 mm	181.9 mm	+0.6 mm
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.5 mm	−1 mm
Weight	508 g	613 g	−105 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024) better than nubia RedMagic Tablet?

Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 600 nits3.3×
OLED panelYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
Wired charging100 W vs 80 W+25%
Weight508 g vs 613 g+21%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia RedMagic Tablet: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
Pixel density275 ppi vs 249 ppi+10%
Thickness5.5 mm vs 6.5 mm+18%
Resolution (short side)1,840 px vs 1,600 px+15%
Resolution (long side)2,800 px vs 2,560 px+9%
Screen-to-body ratio89% vs 83.4%+7%

Why is nubia RedMagic Tablet better than MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)?

Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
CPU frequency2.62 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 (2024)≈ $6209.3	ZTE nubia RedMagic Tablet≈ $5409.3
Design
Weight	508 g	613 g
Thickness	5.5 mm	6.5 mm
Height	271.3 mm	279.7 mm
Width	182.5 mm	181.9 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Gold, White, Black	Black
Display
Screen size	12.2″	12.1″
Panel	Dual-layer OLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (short side)	1,840 px	1,600 px
Resolution (long side)	2,800 px	2,560 px
Pixel density	275 ppi	249 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	2,000 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	1,047 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89%	83.4%
Performance
Chipset	Kirin 9000S	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip maker	Kirin	Qualcomm
Process	7 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.62 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Maleoon 910 MP4	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	726,657	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,550	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,213	—
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	10,100 mAh	10,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	100 W	80 W
Charged in 30 min	64%	62%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	—	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
USB	USB Type-C 3.1	USB Type-C 3.1
USB version	3.1	3.1
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Satellite messaging	Yes	—
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.2 LUFS	—
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass	Accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	13 MP	13 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Rear cameras	2	1
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Front camera	16 MP	16 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	HarmonyOS 4.2	Android 13
Platform	HarmonyOS	Android