Why is T20 better than Tab K9?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8.7″+16%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Drop resistance classB vs E
Why is Tab K9 better than T20?
- Weight412 g vs 320 g+29%
- Repairability classB vs A
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.3+6%
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 80 h+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 8 mm | 9 mm |
| Width | — | 124.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | — | Luna Grey, Seafoam Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | — | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 480 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 14 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | Zen UI 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 80 h |
| Repairability class | B | A |
| Drop resistance class | B | E |
