Why is T20 better than Tab 80?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Screen size10.1″ vs 8″+26%
- Weight412 g vs 610 g+48%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Energy classD vs F
- Drop resistance classB vs E
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 60 h+28%
Why is Tab 80 better than T20?
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 610 g |
| Height | 8 mm | 12 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 8″ |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Allwinner |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Allwinner |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 60 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | E |
