vs
2.5Memory & storage3.1
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than Tab 210?
TIO-80115KBUP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Tab 210 better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- Screen size8″ vs 10.1″+26%
- Endurance per cycle18 h vs 52 h2.9×
- Energy classG vs F
- Repairability classD vs B
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 900+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 500 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Height | — | 10 mm |
| Width | — | 172 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 149 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 70.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Allwinner A537 |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | — |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC1 @750 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 900 |
| Endurance per cycle | 18 h | 52 h |
| Repairability class | D | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
