Why is Tab 210 better than N90?
- Weight500 g vs 615 g+23%
- Battery charge cycles900 vs 800+12%
Why is N90 better than Tab 210?
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size10.1″ vs 12″+19%
- Endurance per cycle52 h vs 145 h2.8×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classF vs D
- Drop resistance classE vs B
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 500 g | 615 g |
| Thickness | 10 mm | — |
| Height | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 172 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 12″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,280 px | — |
| Pixel density | 149 ppi | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 70.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner A537 | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | — |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 @750 MHz | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 900 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 145 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | B |
