zh.md
Compare
Moto Pad (2026) vs RugKing Pad Pro

Motorola Moto Pad (2026) vs UleFone RugKing Pad Pro

What Moto Pad (2026) does better (12) and where RugKing Pad Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2026Moto Pad (2026)

6.1Score

12 advantages≈ $270

Higher score

UleFone · 2026RugKing Pad Pro

5.6Score

5 advantages≈ $190

6.8Display5.6

5.0Performance4.8

4.3Battery4.1

5.2Memory & storage5.2

5.9Features4.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Moto Pad (2026)RugKing Pad Pro

	Moto Pad (2026)	RugKing Pad Pro	Difference
Height	254.6 mm	222 mm	+32.6 mm
Width	166.2 mm	131.5 mm	+34.7 mm
Thickness	7 mm	12.4 mm	−5.4 mm
Weight	480 g	540 g	−60 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Moto Pad (2026) better than RugKing Pad Pro?

5GYes · RugKing Pad Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · RugKing Pad Pro: No
Screen size11″ vs 8.7″+27%
Pixel density274 ppi vs 180 ppi+52%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
Resolution (short side)1,600 px vs 800 px2×
Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Resolution (long side)2,560 px vs 1,340 px+91%
Weight480 g vs 540 g+12%
Wired charging20 W vs 18 W+11%
Thickness7 mm vs 12.4 mm+77%
Screen-to-body ratio82.9% vs 73.3%+13%

Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than Moto Pad (2026)?

Peak brightness500 nits vs 860 nits+72%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
eSIMNo · Moto Pad (2026): Yes
Rear camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Moto Pad (2026)≈ $2706.1	UleFone RugKing Pad Pro≈ $1905.6
Design
Weight	480 g	540 g
Thickness	7 mm	12.4 mm
Height	254.6 mm	222 mm
Width	166.2 mm	131.5 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Aluminium	—
Ingress protection	IP52	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Colours	Pantone Bronze Green	Gray, Black, Yellow
Display
Screen size	11″	8.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	1,600 px	800 px
Resolution (long side)	2,560 px	1,340 px
Pixel density	274 ppi	180 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	860 nits
Measured brightness	392 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	82.9%	73.3%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 6300	Unisoc T7250
Chip maker	MediaTek	Unisoc
Process	6 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	1.8 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MP1
AnTuTu score	527,271	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,981	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,040 mAh	7,100 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	20 W	18 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	Yes
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	No	Yes
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	Yes
GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stylus support	Yes	—
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	—	Side / power button
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	16 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/1.8
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	5 MP	8 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
EU label
Energy class	—	F
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	71 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A