How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. N90 vs PET 11080-2K628E

Nexall N90 vs Peaq PET 11080-2K628E

What N90 does better (7) and where PET 11080-2K628E wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Nexall N90
Nexall · 2026N90
7 advantages≈ $170
vs
Peaq PET 11080-2K628E
Peaq · 2025PET 11080-2K628E
5.5Score
0 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
4.9Memory & storage4.4

Why is N90 better than PET 11080-2K628E?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  2. Screen size12″ vs 11″+10%
  3. Weight615 g vs 754 g+23%
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
  5. Energy classD vs F
  6. Drop resistance classB vs E
  7. Endurance per cycle145 h vs 86 h+69%

Why is PET 11080-2K628E better than N90?

PET 11080-2K628E has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Nexall N90Nexall N90≈ $170
Design
Weight615 g754 g
Height8 mm7 mm
Ingress protectionIP44IP42
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx2
Display
Screen size12″11″
OLED panelNoNo
Peak brightness—450 nits
Performance
Chipset—MediaTek Helio
Chip maker—MediaTek
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
eSIMNo—
Dual SIMNo—
Bluetooth—5.3
EU label
Energy classDF
Battery charge cycles800800
Endurance per cycle145 h86 h
Repairability classBB
Drop resistance classBE
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare