How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. N90 vs Redmi Pad 2 9.7

Nexall N90 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7

What N90 does better (3) and where Redmi Pad 2 9.7 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Nexall N90
Nexall · 2026N90
3 advantages≈ $170
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
Xiaomi · 2026Redmi Pad 2 9.7
5.5Score
1 advantage≈ $170
Higher score
4.9Memory & storage3.8

Why is N90 better than Redmi Pad 2 9.7?

  1. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  2. Screen size12″ vs 9.7″+24%
  3. Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×

Why is Redmi Pad 2 9.7 better than N90?

  1. Weight615 g vs 406 g+51%
Specifications

Side by side

Nexall N90Nexall N90≈ $170
Design
Weight615 g406 g
Thickness—7.4 mm
Height8 mm226.5 mm
Width—148 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Ingress protectionIP44—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
Colours—Graphite Gray, Silver
Display
Screen size12″9.7″
Panel—IPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)—1,280 px
Resolution (long side)—2,048 px
Pixel density—268 ppi
Refresh rate—120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits
Measured brightness—416 nits
Screen-to-body ratio—87.9%
Performance
Chipset—Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
Chip maker—Qualcomm
Process—6 nm
CPU cores—8
CPU frequency—2.9 GHz
GPU—Adreno 610
AnTuTu score—560,711
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)—1,549
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB64 GB
Storage type—UFS 2.2
Memory card slot—Yes
Battery
Battery capacity—7,600 mAh
Battery type—Li-Po
Wired charging—18 W
Wireless charging—No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)NoNo
5G—No
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standard—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5
USB—USB Type-C
USB version—2
NFC—No
GPS—No
Features
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack—Yes
Sensors—Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera—8 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2
Rear cameras—1
Ultra-wide camera—No
Optical stabilisation—No
Max video—1080p
Front camera—5 MP
4K front-camera video—No
Software
OS at launch—Android 16
Platform—Android
Interface—HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy classD—
Battery charge cycles800—
Endurance per cycle145 h—
Repairability classB—
Drop resistance classB—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare