Why is Pad 200 better than T60?
- Screen size13.4″ vs 12.2″+10%
Why is T60 better than Pad 200?
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Pixel density169 ppi vs 236 ppi+40%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx0 vs IPx4
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Drop resistance classC vs B
- Weight750 g vs 640 g+17%
- Endurance per cycle138 h vs 156 h+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 750 g | 640 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | — |
| Height | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Width | 201.5 mm | — |
| Ingress protection | IP50 | IP44 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx0 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Space Grey, Glacier Blue | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 13.4″ | 12.2″ |
| Panel | IPS TFT | — |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | — |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | — |
| Pixel density | 169 ppi | 236 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,300 mAh | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | — |
| Platform | Android | — |
| Interface | DokeOS 5.0 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 138 h | 156 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | C | B |
