vs
6.0Display7.1
5.1Performance6.1
3.9Battery6.7
5.5Memory & storage6.1
6.0Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9+Galaxy Tab S9 FE
| Galaxy Tab A9+ | Galaxy Tab S9 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 257.1 mm | 254.3 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 165.8 mm | +2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 523 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Galaxy Tab S9 FE?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy Tab S9 FE: No
- Weight480 g vs 523 g+9%
Why is Galaxy Tab S9 FE better than Galaxy Tab A9+?
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- AnTuTu score582,451 vs 741,211+27%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,072 vs 2,910+40%
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+14%
- Measured brightness456 nits vs 692 nits+52%
- Peak brightness500 nits vs 750 nits+50%
- Front camera5 MP vs 12 MP2.4×
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 249 ppi+21%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 50%2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 523 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.5 mm |
| Height | 257.1 mm | 254.3 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Mint, Silver, Gray, Lavender |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 10.9″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,304 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | 750 nits |
| Measured brightness | 456 nits | 692 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.9% | 81.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 582,451 | 741,211 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,072 | 2,910 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | One UI 6 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Pad 6
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
6.55.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsHonor Pad X9
5.85.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsOnePlus Pad Go
5.86.4