zh.md
Compare
Galaxy Tab A9 vs Redmi Pad SE

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE

What Galaxy Tab A9 does better (9) and where Redmi Pad SE wins (12) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab A9

4.8Score

9 advantages≈ $190

Xiaomi · 2023Redmi Pad SE

6.1Score

12 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

3.3Display5.5

4.4Performance3.5

3.0Battery6.9

4.8Memory & storage6.1

3.8Features3.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab A9Redmi Pad SE

	Galaxy Tab A9	Redmi Pad SE	Difference
Height	211 mm	255.5 mm	−44.5 mm
Width	124.7 mm	167.1 mm	−42.4 mm
Thickness	8 mm	7.4 mm	+0.6 mm
Weight	332 g	478 g	−146 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Redmi Pad SE?

AnTuTu score508,554 vs 242,8852.1×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,943 vs 1,201+62%
Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad SE: No
Weight332 g vs 478 g+44%
Peak brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
GPSYes · Redmi Pad SE: No
Measured brightness460 nits vs 402 nits+14%
Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Charged in 30 min25% vs 24%+4%

Why is Redmi Pad SE better than Galaxy Tab A9?

Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+57%
Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Screen size8.7″ vs 11″+26%
Front camera2 MP vs 5 MP2.5×
Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
Pixel density179 ppi vs 207 ppi+16%
CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,200 px+50%
Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 1,920 px+43%
Thickness8 mm vs 7.4 mm+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy Tab A9≈ $1904.8	Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE≈ $2206.1
Design
Weight	332 g	478 g
Thickness	8 mm	7.4 mm
Height	211 mm	255.5 mm
Width	124.7 mm	167.1 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Colours	Graphite, Silver, Navy	Lavender Purple, Graphite Gray, Mint Green
Display
Screen size	8.7″	11″
Panel	TFT LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	800 px	1,200 px
Resolution (long side)	1,340 px	1,920 px
Pixel density	179 ppi	207 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	500 nits	400 nits
Measured brightness	460 nits	402 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	81.7%	81.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G99	Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	508,554	242,885
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,943	1,201
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	64 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	eMMC 5.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,100 mAh	8,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	13.9 h
Wired charging	15 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	25%	24%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
NFC	No	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-23.2 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Accelerometer, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	8 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	—	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	2 MP	5 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	HyperOS 2