How we score Blog Advertise
zh.mdevery tablet, side by side,
610 models
  1. zh.md
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Tab A9 vs Pad 6

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9 vs Xiaomi Pad 6

What Galaxy Tab A9 does better (5) and where Pad 6 wins (22) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9
Samsung · 2023Galaxy Tab A9
4.8Score
5 advantages≈ $190
vs
Xiaomi Pad 6
Xiaomi · 2023Pad 6
7.2Score
22 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
3.3Display7.8
4.4Performance6.9
3.0Battery6.1
4.8Memory & storage5.6
3.8Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy Tab A9Pad 6
124.7 × 2118165.2 × 2546.5
Galaxy Tab A9Pad 6Difference
Height211 mm254 mm−43 mm
Width124.7 mm165.2 mm−40.5 mm
Thickness8 mm6.5 mm+1.5 mm
Weight332 g490 g−158 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Pad 6?

  1. Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 6: No
  2. Weight332 g vs 490 g+48%
  3. Memory card slotYes · Pad 6: No
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 6: No
  5. Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%

Why is Pad 6 better than Galaxy Tab A9?

  1. AnTuTu score508,554 vs 1,005,598+98%
  2. Refresh rate60 Hz vs 144 Hz2.4×
  3. Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 8,840 mAh+73%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,943 vs 3,506+80%
  5. Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
  6. Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
  7. Pixel density179 ppi vs 309 ppi+73%
  8. Screen size8.7″ vs 11″+26%
  9. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+45%
  10. Front camera2 MP vs 8 MP4×
  11. Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,800 px2.2×
  12. Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 2,880 px2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Pad 6Xiaomi Pad 6≈ $4307.2
Design
Weight332 g490 g
Thickness8 mm6.5 mm
Height211 mm254 mm
Width124.7 mm165.2 mm
Frame—Aluminium
Back—Aluminium
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 3
ColoursGraphite, Silver, NavyBlack, Blue, Gold
Display
Screen size8.7″11″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (short side)800 px1,800 px
Resolution (long side)1,340 px2,880 px
Pixel density179 ppi309 ppi
Refresh rate60 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits550 nits
Measured brightness460 nits500 nits
Screen-to-body ratio81.7%83.6%
HDR—Yes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process6 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz3.2 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 650
AnTuTu score508,5541,005,598
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,9433,506
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—1,147
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB256 GB
Storage (base)64 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
Memory card slotYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,100 mAh8,840 mAh
Battery typeLi-PoLi-Po
Active use (test)—9.7 h
Wired charging15 W33 W
Charged in 30 min25%38%
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)YesNo
5GNo—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMNoNo
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output (USB-C / DisplayPort)—Yes
NFCNoNo
GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS—
Features
Stylus support—Yes
Stereo speakersYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-23.7 LUFS
3.5 mm headphone jackYesNo
SensorsAccelerometer, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera8 MP13 MP
Rear camera aperture—f/2.2
Rear cameras11
Ultra-wide cameraNoNo
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Max video1080p4K
4K video frame rate—30 fps
Front camera2 MP8 MP
4K front-camera videoNoNo
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 8MIUI Pad 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare