vs
3.3Display6.8
4.4Performance4.0
3.0Battery8.4
4.8Memory & storage5.5
3.8Features7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9Galaxy Tab S7 FE
| Galaxy Tab A9 | Galaxy Tab S7 FE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 211 mm | 284.8 mm | −73.8 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 185 mm | −60.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.3 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 332 g | 608 g | −276 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Galaxy Tab S7 FE?
- AnTuTu score508,554 vs 292,530+74%
- Weight332 g vs 608 g+83%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,943 vs 1,904+2%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy Tab S7 FE: No
- Process6 nm vs 8 nm+33%
Why is Galaxy Tab S7 FE better than Galaxy Tab A9?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 10,090 mAh+98%
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GNo · Galaxy Tab A9: Yes
- Screen size8.7″ vs 12.4″+43%
- Front camera2 MP vs 5 MP2.5×
- Pixel density179 ppi vs 243 ppi+36%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,600 px2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 2,560 px+91%
- Measured brightness460 nits vs 522 nits+13%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 332 g | 608 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.3 mm |
| Height | 211 mm | 284.8 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 185 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Mystic Black, Mystic Silver, Mystic Green, Mystic Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 12.4″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 243 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 460 nits | 522 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G - 5G model |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 - 5G model Adreno 642L - Wi-Fi model |
| AnTuTu score | 508,554 | 292,530 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,943 | 1,904 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 10,090 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.2 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro (5G model only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | One UI 6 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Pad 6
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.24.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6