vs
3.3Display4.7
3.0Battery5.2
3.8Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9Tab 11
| Galaxy Tab A9 | Tab 11 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 211 mm | 259 mm | −48 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 163.6 mm | −38.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 332 g | 462 g | −130 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Tab 11?
- Stereo speakersYes · Tab 11: No
- Weight332 g vs 462 g+39%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Tab 11 better than Galaxy Tab A9?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+57%
- Screen size8.7″ vs 11″+26%
- Front camera2 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Pixel density179 ppi vs 213 ppi+19%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,200 px+50%
- Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 2,000 px+49%
- Thickness8 mm vs 6.9 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 332 g | 462 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 211 mm | 259 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Digital Lavender, Dark Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 11″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 1,200 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 2,000 px |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 213 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 460 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 80.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 508,554 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,943 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | — |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Pad 6
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.24.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6