vs
3.3Display3.0
4.4Performance2.9
3.0Battery2.9
4.8Memory & storage4.1
3.8Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9G5 Tab
| Galaxy Tab A9 | G5 Tab | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 211 mm | 239.3 mm | −28.3 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 158.1 mm | −33.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 332 g | 465 g | −133 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than G5 Tab?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 10 W+50%
- Weight332 g vs 465 g+40%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+38%
- Pixel density179 ppi vs 149 ppi+20%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 1,280 px+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.7% vs 78.2%+4%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Why is G5 Tab better than Galaxy Tab A9?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+18%
- Screen size8.7″ vs 10.1″+16%
- Front camera2 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 332 g | 465 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 211 mm | 239.3 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 158.1 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Aluminium |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Space Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 460 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 78.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 508,554 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,943 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Pad 6
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.24.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6