vs
3.3Display7.1
4.4Performance4.7
3.0Battery7.0
4.8Memory & storage4.8
3.8Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9Pad 5
| Galaxy Tab A9 | Pad 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 211 mm | 254.7 mm | −43.7 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 166.3 mm | −41.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm | +1.1 mm |
| Weight | 332 g | 511 g | −179 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9 better than Pad 5?
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 5: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- AnTuTu score508,554 vs 473,819+7%
- Weight332 g vs 511 g+54%
- Memory card slotYes · Pad 5: No
- GPSYes · Pad 5: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 5: No
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Pad 5 better than Galaxy Tab A9?
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 8,720 mAh+71%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,943 vs 2,583+33%
- Screen size8.7″ vs 11″+26%
- Pixel density179 ppi vs 274 ppi+53%
- Front camera2 MP vs 8 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.96 GHz+35%
- Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,600 px2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 332 g | 511 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 211 mm | 254.7 mm |
| Width | 124.7 mm | 166.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 11″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 179 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 460 nits | 478 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 82.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.96 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | 508,554 | 473,819 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,943 | 2,583 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 8,720 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.4 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | MIUI 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Pad 6
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
4.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.24.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9
4.88.6


