vs
5.6Display3.3
4.8Performance4.3
4.1Battery3.3
5.2Memory & storage4.6
4.1Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
RugKing Pad ProBlack Shark Pad SE
| RugKing Pad Pro | Black Shark Pad SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 222 mm | 255 mm | −33 mm |
| Width | 131.5 mm | 167 mm | −35.5 mm |
| Thickness | 12.4 mm | 7.4 mm | +5 mm |
| Weight | 540 g | 478 g | +62 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than Black Shark Pad SE?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- Peak brightness860 nits vs 450 nits+91%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging18 W vs 10 W+80%
- Battery capacity7,100 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+8%
- Pixel density180 ppi vs 149 ppi+21%
- eSIMYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
- GPSYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Black Shark Pad SE: No
- Rear camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
- Screen-to-body ratio73.3% vs 69.5%+5%
Why is Black Shark Pad SE better than RugKing Pad Pro?
- Stereo speakersNo · RugKing Pad Pro: Yes
- Screen size8.7″ vs 10.1″+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Weight540 g vs 478 g+13%
- CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz+11%
- Thickness12.4 mm vs 7.4 mm+68%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 540 g | 478 g |
| Thickness | 12.4 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 222 mm | 255 mm |
| Width | 131.5 mm | 167 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Gray, Black, Yellow | Black, Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8.7″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 800 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,340 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 180 ppi | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 860 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 73.3% | 69.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc T7250 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,100 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side / power button | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 71 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
5.65.4
vs
Nexall N90vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro
5.65.6
vs
UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsXiaomi Poco Pad C1
5.65.5
vs
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad SEvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro
4.95.4
vs
Nexall N90vsXiaomi Black Shark Pad SE