zh.md
Compare
RugKing Pad Pro vs Redmi Pad 2 9.7

UleFone RugKing Pad Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7

What RugKing Pad Pro does better (9) and where Redmi Pad 2 9.7 wins (12) — every spec side by side.

UleFone · 2026RugKing Pad Pro

5.6Score

9 advantages≈ $190

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2026Redmi Pad 2 9.7

5.5Score

12 advantages≈ $170

5.6Display6.7

4.8Performance4.8

4.1Battery4.5

5.2Memory & storage3.8

4.1Features3.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

RugKing Pad ProRedmi Pad 2 9.7

	RugKing Pad Pro	Redmi Pad 2 9.7	Difference
Height	222 mm	226.5 mm	−4.5 mm
Width	131.5 mm	148 mm	−16.5 mm
Thickness	12.4 mm	7.4 mm	+5 mm
Weight	540 g	406 g	+134 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is RugKing Pad Pro better than Redmi Pad 2 9.7?

Cellular (LTE)Yes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
Peak brightness860 nits vs 600 nits+43%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
eSIMYes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
GPSYes · Redmi Pad 2 9.7: No
Rear camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
Front camera8 MP vs 5 MP+60%
Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%

Why is Redmi Pad 2 9.7 better than RugKing Pad Pro?

Stereo speakersNo · RugKing Pad Pro: Yes
Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
Battery capacity7,100 mAh vs 7,600 mAh+7%
CPU frequency1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz+61%
Pixel density180 ppi vs 268 ppi+49%
Screen size8.7″ vs 9.7″+12%
Weight540 g vs 406 g+33%
Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
Thickness12.4 mm vs 7.4 mm+68%
Resolution (short side)800 px vs 1,280 px+60%
Resolution (long side)1,340 px vs 2,048 px+53%
Screen-to-body ratio73.3% vs 87.9%+20%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	UleFone RugKing Pad Pro≈ $1905.6	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7≈ $1705.5
Design
Weight	540 g	406 g
Thickness	12.4 mm	7.4 mm
Height	222 mm	226.5 mm
Width	131.5 mm	148 mm
Frame	—	Aluminium
Back	—	Aluminium
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	—
Colours	Gray, Black, Yellow	Graphite Gray, Silver
Display
Screen size	8.7″	9.7″
Panel	IPS LCD	IPS LCD
OLED panel	No	No
Resolution (short side)	800 px	1,280 px
Resolution (long side)	1,340 px	2,048 px
Pixel density	180 ppi	268 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	860 nits	600 nits
Measured brightness	—	416 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	73.3%	87.9%
Performance
Chipset	Unisoc T7250	Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2
Chip maker	Unisoc	Qualcomm
Process	12 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	1.8 GHz	2.9 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MP1	Adreno 610
AnTuTu score	—	560,711
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	1,549
Memory
RAM	8 GB	6 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	64 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	7,100 mAh	7,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	18 W	18 W
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
Cellular (LTE)	Yes	No
5G	No	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
NFC	Yes	No
GPS	Yes	No
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	No	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Fingerprint sensor	Side / power button	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only)
Cameras
Rear camera	16 MP	8 MP
Rear camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Rear cameras	1	1
Ultra-wide camera	No	No
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Front camera	8 MP	5 MP
4K front-camera video	No	No
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS 3
EU label
Energy class	F	—
Battery charge cycles	1,000	—
Endurance per cycle	71 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	A	—

Related comparisons

UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.65.4

Nexall N90vsUleFone RugKing Pad Pro

UleFone RugKing Pad ProvsXiaomi Poco Pad C1 5.65.5

Lenovo IdeaTab 2025vsXiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7

Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsAlldoCube iPlay 80 mini Pro 5.55.4

Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7vsNexall N90