vs
2.5Memory & storage4.1
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than U11 Kid?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx0
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is U11 Kid better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size8″ vs 11″+38%
- Endurance per cycle18 h vs 131 h7.3×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Energy classG vs E
- Repairability classD vs B
- Drop resistance classE vs C
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 537 g |
| Thickness | — | 7.9 mm |
| Height | — | 8 mm |
| Width | — | 169.6 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP20 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx0 |
| Colours | — | Peach Pink, Sprout Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 11″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 137 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 350 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 80.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | Unisoc Tiger |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | Unisoc |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 8,580 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | E |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 18 h | 131 h |
| Repairability class | D | B |
| Drop resistance class | E | C |
