vs
2.5Memory & storage3.1
Why is TIO-80115KBUP better than Tab K9?
TIO-80115KBUP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Tab K9 better than TIO-80115KBUP?
- Endurance per cycle18 h vs 80 h4.4×
- Screen size8″ vs 8.7″+9%
- Energy classG vs D
- Repairability classD vs A
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 1,000+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 320 g |
| Thickness | — | 8.5 mm |
| Height | — | 9 mm |
| Width | — | 124.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx2 |
| Colours | — | Luna Grey, Seafoam Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 8.7″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,340 px |
| Pixel density | — | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 480 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 81.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | MediaTek Helio |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | MediaTek |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 14 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| Interface | — | Zen UI 16 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | G | D |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 18 h | 80 h |
| Repairability class | D | A |
| Drop resistance class | E | E |
