Why is T20 better than Tab 210?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Weight412 g vs 500 g+21%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- Energy classD vs F
- Drop resistance classB vs E
- Endurance per cycle77 h vs 52 h+48%
Why is Tab 210 better than T20?
- Battery charge cycles800 vs 900+12%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 412 g | 500 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Height | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Width | — | 172 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP44 | IP42 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 10.1″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS TFT |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 149 ppi |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 70.8% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger | Allwinner A537 |
| Chip maker | Unisoc | — |
| CPU cores | — | 8 |
| CPU frequency | — | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC1 @750 MHz |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 15 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | D | F |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | 900 |
| Endurance per cycle | 77 h | 52 h |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | E |
