Why is Tab 80 better than Pad 60?
- RAM4 GB vs 3 GB+33%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 4.1+27%
Why is Pad 60 better than Tab 80?
- Screen size8″ vs 10.1″+26%
- Weight610 g vs 537 g+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 610 g | 537 g |
| Thickness | — | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 12 mm | 246.5 mm |
| Width | — | 163 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP42 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | — |
| Colours | — | Misty Blue, Meteorite Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 8″ | 10.1″ |
| Panel | — | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | — | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | — | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | — | 149 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 73.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Allwinner | — |
| Chip maker | Allwinner | — |
| CPU cores | — | 4 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 6,580 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 10 W |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | No | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Dual SIM | — | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | — | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.1 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| NFC | — | No |
| GPS | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | — | 5 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | — | No |
| Optical stabilisation | — | No |
| Front camera | — | 2 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | — | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | — | Android 12 |
| Platform | — | Android |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | F | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 800 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 60 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | E | — |
