vs
6.0Display2.4
5.1Performance3.8
3.9Battery4.6
5.5Memory & storage3.1
6.0Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9+Armor Pad
| Galaxy Tab A9+ | Armor Pad | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 257.1 mm | 213 mm | +44.1 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 128.8 mm | +39.9 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 14 mm | −7.1 mm |
| Weight | 480 g | 560 g | −80 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Armor Pad?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- 5GYes · Armor Pad: No
- Screen size11″ vs 8″+38%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 14 mm2×
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- eSIMYes · Armor Pad: No
- Weight480 g vs 560 g+17%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 189 ppi+9%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 800 px+50%
Why is Armor Pad better than Galaxy Tab A9+?
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 7,650 mAh+9%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 560 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 257.1 mm | 213 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 128.8 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 800 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 1,280 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 456 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.9% | 67.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Mediatek MT6762 Helio G25 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| AnTuTu score | 582,451 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,072 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 7,650 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | Yes |
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side / power button |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2.2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | F |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 84 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Pad 6
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
6.55.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsHonor Pad X9
5.85.4