vs
6.0Display7.1
5.1Performance4.7
3.9Battery7.0
5.5Memory & storage4.8
6.0Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy Tab A9+Pad 5
| Galaxy Tab A9+ | Pad 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 257.1 mm | 254.7 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 166.3 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 480 g | 511 g | −31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy Tab A9+ better than Pad 5?
- AnTuTu score582,451 vs 473,819+23%
- Cellular (LTE)Yes · Pad 5: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Pad 5: No
- eSIMYes · Pad 5: No
- GPSYes · Pad 5: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Pad 5: No
- Weight480 g vs 511 g+6%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Pad 5 better than Galaxy Tab A9+?
- Wired charging15 W vs 33 W2.2×
- Battery capacity7,040 mAh vs 8,720 mAh+24%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,072 vs 2,583+25%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.96 GHz+35%
- Pixel density206 ppi vs 274 ppi+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Measured brightness456 nits vs 478 nits+5%
- Rear camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Front camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Resolution (short side)1,200 px vs 1,600 px+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 480 g | 511 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 6.9 mm |
| Height | 257.1 mm | 254.7 mm |
| Width | 168.7 mm | 166.3 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Colours | Graphite, Silver, Navy | Cosmic Gray, Pearl White, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 11″ | 11″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (short side) | 1,200 px | 1,600 px |
| Resolution (long side) | 1,920 px | 2,560 px |
| Pixel density | 206 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 456 nits | 478 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 80.9% | 82.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.96 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 640 |
| AnTuTu score | 582,451 | 473,819 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,072 | 2,583 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,040 mAh | 8,720 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Cellular (LTE) | Yes | No |
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5 |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stylus support | — | Yes |
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.4 LUFS |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Cameras | ||
| Rear camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Rear camera aperture | — | f/2 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K front-camera video | No | No |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8 | MIUI 14 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5.86.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsXiaomi Pad 6
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9
5.84.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 FE
5.87.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+vsSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
6.55.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+vsHonor Pad X9
5.85.4