≈ $320
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,103 vs 1,244
- AnTuTu score 1,048,658 vs 817,549
- Cellular (LTE)
- Battery capacity 10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- 3.5 mm headphone jack
- zh.md
- Tablets
- Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- Alternatives
Alternatives to Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
10 tablets at a similar price that compete with the Poco Pad M1 — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Poco Pad M1
≈ $380
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 2,939 vs 1,244
- Cellular (LTE)
- 5G
- Battery capacity 10,050 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- AnTuTu score 719,742 vs 817,549
≈ $380
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Screen size 13″ vs 12.1″
- GPS
- Battery capacity 10,000 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Active use (test) 11.4 h vs 14.8 h
≈ $970
- Cellular (LTE)
- 5G
- eSIM
- Battery capacity 10,100 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Screen size 10.1″ vs 12.1″
≈ $420
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,438 vs 1,244
- AnTuTu score 1,604,810 vs 817,549
- RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Measured brightness 384 nits vs 581 nits
≈ $320
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,286 vs 1,244
- AnTuTu score 986,882 vs 817,549
- Cellular (LTE)
- Active use (test) 12.9 h vs 14.8 h
- Storage (base) 128 GB vs 256 GB
≈ $350
- RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 5G
- Wired charging 45 W vs 33 W
- Battery capacity 10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz
≈ $300
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 4,370 vs 1,244
- AnTuTu score 1,564,600 vs 817,549
- RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 10,200 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Peak brightness 400 nits vs 600 nits
≈ $350
- Wired charging 67 W vs 33 W
- Refresh rate 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- Pixel density 304 ppi vs 249 ppi
- Storage (max) 128 GB vs 256 GB
- Battery capacity 10,420 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
≈ $530
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core) 3,860 vs 1,244
- AnTuTu score 1,264,130 vs 817,549
- RAM 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 10,090 mAh vs 12,000 mAh
- Refresh rate 90 Hz vs 120 Hz